Role of nutritional status in predicting quality of life outcomes in cancer – a systematic review of the epidemiological literature
© Lis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 February 2012
Accepted: 24 April 2012
Published: 24 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shantanu Deshpande|
|12 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giorgio Capuano|
|15 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla|
|23 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Digant Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shantanu Deshpande|
|26 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.