Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Role of nutritional status in predicting quality of life outcomes in cancer – a systematic review of the epidemiological literature

  • Christopher G Lis1,
  • Digant Gupta1Email author,
  • Carolyn A Lammersfeld1,
  • Maurie Markman1 and
  • Pankaj G Vashi1
Nutrition Journal201211:27

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-27

Received: 1 February 2012

Accepted: 24 April 2012

Published: 24 April 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shantanu Deshpande
12 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giorgio Capuano
15 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla
23 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Digant Gupta
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shantanu Deshpande
26 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-11-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer Treatment Centers of America® (CTCA)

Advertisement