Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dietary meat and fat intake and prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis in pregnant Japanese women: baseline data from the Kyushu Okinawa Maternal and Child Health Study

  • Yoshihiro Miyake1Email author,
  • Keiko Tanaka1,
  • Hitomi Okubo2,
  • Satoshi Sasaki2 and
  • Masashi Arakawa3
Nutrition Journal201211:19

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-19

Received: 24 January 2012

Accepted: 27 March 2012

Published: 27 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
24 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabriele Nagel
16 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ichiro Matsunaga
12 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yoshihiro Miyake
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ichiro Matsunaga
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-11-19

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University
Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Course of Wellness, Graduate School of Tourism Sciences, University of the Ryukyus