Participant experiences from chronic administration of a multivitamin versus placebo on subjective health and wellbeing: a double-blind qualitative analysis of a randomised controlled trial
© Sarris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 August 2012
Accepted: 30 November 2012
Published: 14 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Rucklidge|
|12 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michele Larzelere|
|10 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Cox|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michele Larzelere|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Rucklidge|
|23 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Cox|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-110|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.