100% Orange juice consumption is associated with better diet quality, improved nutrient adequacy, decreased risk for obesity, and improved biomarkers of health in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2006
© O'Neil et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 March 2012
Accepted: 30 November 2012
Published: 12 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecilia Nunes|
|3 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Grandjean|
|11 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Carol O'Neil|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecilia Nunes|
|3 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Grandjean|
|28 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Carol O'Neil|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecilia Nunes|
|8 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Grandjean|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|30 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|12 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-107|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.