Variation in vitamin D supplementation among adults in a multi-race/ethnic health plan population, 2008
© Gordon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 31 May 2012
Accepted: 30 November 2012
Published: 11 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - erin LeBlanc|
|5 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marta Induni|
|14 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junko Ishihara|
|14 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy Gordon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marta Induni|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - erin LeBlanc|
|28 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy Gordon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-104|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.