Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Growth and weight status in treatment-naïve 12-16 year old adolescents with Alcohol Use Disorders in Cape Town, South Africa

  • Celeste E Naude1Email author,
  • Marjanne Senekal2,
  • Ria Laubscher3,
  • Paul D Carey4 and
  • George Fein5
Nutrition Journal201110:87

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-87

Received: 25 May 2011

Accepted: 23 August 2011

Published: 23 August 2011

Abstract

Background

Heavy alcohol consumption during adolescence has many known harmful health and social consequences and is strongly associated with numerous health risk behaviours. The consequences of heavy alcohol use during adolescence on nutritional status, specifically growth and weight status are largely unknown at this time.

Methods

Substance use, anthropometric indices of growth and weight, dietary energy intake and physical activity in heavy drinking adolescents (meeting DSM-IV criteria for alcohol use disorders) and matched light/non-drinking control adolescents were assessed.

Results

Lifetime alcohol dose, measured in standard drinks of alcohol, was orders of magnitude higher in adolescents with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) compared to controls. The AUDs group was selected to represent relatively 'pure' AUDs, with minimal other drug use and no psychiatric diagnoses. The growth and weight status of adolescents with AUDs were generally comparable to that of controls, and is in line with the growth and weight status of the South African adolescent population. A greater proportion of overweight/obese females was found in both groups, with this percentage tending to be greater, although not significantly so, in the AUDs group. Adolescent females with AUDs had increased odds of being overweight/obese compared to controls, after adjustment for smoking, physical activity and energy intake.

Conclusion

Anthropometric indices of growth and weight status of participants in the Control and AUD groups were generally comparable. Female adolescents with AUDs may have an increased risk of being overweight/obese compared to adolescent females without AUDs. The presence of an AUD in our adolescent sample was associated with higher energy intake. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the effects of heavy alcohol use on energy balance, growth and weight status in adolescents as they age. Nonetheless, the current study contributes to our understanding of the impacts of heavy alcohol consumption on important aspects of adolescent development.

Keywords

adolescent alcohol growth weight anthropometry energy intake

Introduction

Heavy alcohol consumption during the crucial developmental period of adolescence is an important public health concern in both in developed [1, 2] and developing countries [3, 4]. Adolescent alcohol abuse/dependence has many known harmful health and social consequences, such as school failure [5], crime and violence [6], increased risk of adult alcohol dependence/abuse, illicit drug use, social adversity [7] cardiovascular disease [8], and is also strongly associated with a wide range of other health risk behaviours [2]. Examination of the effects of heavy alcohol use during adolescence has expanded in recent years [9], however, the consequences for adolescent nutritional status are largely unknown at this time.

The 2008 South African Youth Risk Behaviour Survey (YRBS) reports that 35% of a national sample of grade 8 to 11 adolescents (n = 10 270) reported drinking alcohol on one or more days in the month preceding the survey. Nationally, 29% of adolescents had engaged in past month binge drinking, a significant increase from the rate of 23% in the 2002 YRBS [10]. Significantly more learners in the Western Cape Province (41%) had engaged in binge drinking in the past month when compared to the national average of 29% [4].

Globally, adolescents are recognized as a nutritionally at-risk group [11]. High nutritional demand for growth and development, poor eating behaviour during adolescence [1113], and a propensity for risk-taking behaviours are all threats to nutritional adequacy [11]. Adolescent eating patterns are typically characterised by high consumption of sweetened beverages, increased intake of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods, and frequently skipping meals, particularly breakfast [1316]. South African adolescents are no exception [17, 18]. Poor nutrition during this life-stage, which is also characterised by the adolescent growth spurt, may be associated with stunting (chronic undernutrition), underweight (chronic negative energy balance), or being overweight or obese (chronic positive energy balance)[11].

Alcohol is energy-dense and energy provided by alcoholic drinks is derived from the alcohol (29 kilojoules per gram) and the carbohydrates (17 kilojoules per gram) they contain, with most drinks containing negligible amounts of other nutrients [19]. Heavy alcohol use may affect total energy intake in a variety of ways. First, if alcohol energy replaces food energy (thus no change in total energy intake) dietary quality is reduced, with poor intake of essential macro- and micronutrients, even though energy needs may be met. This nutrient inadequacy increases the risk for nutrient deficiencies, which may enhance the risk for stunting (low height-for-age) [20]. Second, heavy alcohol use may result in a more significant reduction in dietary intake with energy from alcohol not compensating for the total loss of dietary energy intake. Inadequate energy and nutrient intake could manifest in the adolescent as underweight (low body mass index (BMI)-for-age) or possibly stunting [20]. However, it must be borne in mind, that the greatest risk for stunting remains poor nutrition during the first two years of life [21]. Third, alcohol containing drinks could be ingested in addition to usual food intake, resulting in increased total energy consumption, compounding the risks for weight gain and being overweight/obese (high BMI-for-age) [20].

A recent review examined the outcomes of preload studies of the effects of alcohol on subsequent food intake in adults, and reported that in the short-term, energy ingested as alcohol is additive to energy consumed from other sources, suggesting that alcohol promotes short-term passive over-consumption of energy [22]. According to Yeomans (2010), alcohol is very inefficient at triggering the satiety mechanisms involved in short-term control of food intake. Adult studies have further found alcohol use to be positively associated with BMI or obesity [2325]. The work by Oesterle and colleagues, namely that chronic heavy drinkers aged 10 to 24 years were nearly four times more likely to be overweight or obese at age 24, suggests that this may be true for adolescents [26]. The positive association between alcohol and tobacco use and unhealthy eating habits such as consuming sweetened carbonated drinks, sweets and snacks, as reported in adolescents [2730], further compounds these risks. As such, it is reasonable to speculate that dietary changes associated with heavy alcohol use in adolescence may include a higher intake of energy-dense foods, thus contributing to increased total energy intake. Thus, heavy alcohol use during adolescence may promote overweight and obesity via the additive effect of alcohol energy as well as dietary changes favouring energy-dense items, resulting in a persistent positive energy balance.

The 2002 and 2008 YRBSs in South Africa show overnutrition to be a greater problem in this age group than undernutrition, with an increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity nationally from 2002 to 2008 (21 to 25%), especially in the mixed ancestry population (16.6 to 22.4%). The prevalence of overweight and obesity was consistently greater in females nationally, in the Western Cape Province, and in the mixed ancestry population group [4, 10]. This follows a widely recognised global trend in which overweight exceeds underweight in females in more than half of the world's developing countries [31].

Heavy alcohol ingestion can compound the problem of positive energy balance in usual dietary intake, increasing the risk for weight gain. Thus, it is argued that heavy alcohol use during adolescence may increase the risk for overweight and obesity. At this time, studies investigating the association between heavy alcohol use, energy balance, growth and weight status of adolescents are lacking internationally, with no such studies having been conducted in South Africa.

The current study examines anthropometric indices of growth and weight status in treatment-naive, 12 to 16 year old community-dwelling adolescents with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in comparison to matched light/non-drinking control adolescents, both groups without co-morbid substance use disorders (SUDs) or psychiatric disorders, as part of a larger study exploring the effects of heavy alcohol use on brain structure and function. The inclusion of adolescents without co-morbid externalizing disorders or SUDs, allows us to study the effects of AUDs on growth and weight indices without the confounding effects of other substance abuse or externalising disorder risk factors. It is hypothesised that anthropometric indices of growth and weight status may be different in adolescents with AUDs compared to light/non-drinking control adolescents.

Methods

Study Population and Participants

This study examined adolescents with relatively 'pure' AUDs, without concomitant drug use or psychiatric (including externalizing) diagnoses. The sample (n = 162) consisted of low socio-economic status English or Afrikaans-speaking adolescents (ages 12 to 16 years) from schools within a 25-km radius of Tygerberg Hospital located in the greater metropolitan area of Cape Town, South Africa. Screening procedures included a structured psychiatric diagnostic interview, a developmental and medical history (from participants and at least one biological parent or legal guardian) and a detailed physical and neurological examination assessing developmental delays. The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (six to 18 years) Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) [32] was used to screen for psychiatric diagnoses. The Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcohol (SSAGA-II) [33] was used to confirm AUDs diagnosis and to derive detailed substance use histories (alcohol, tobacco and all other drugs).

Participants were assigned to one of two groups: an AUDs group meeting DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse [34] or a light/non-drinking Control group (lifetime dose of < 100 standard drinks of alcohol or never consumed alcohol). Exclusion criteria for both groups were: mental retardation, lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses other than AUDs (as defined in the KSADS-PL, including major depression, dysthymia, mania, hypomania, cyclothymia, bipolar disorders, schizoaffective disorders, schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, brief reactive psychosis, panic disorder, agoraphobia, separation anxiety disorder, avoidant disorder of childhood and adolescence, simple phobia, social phobia, overanxious disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, enuresis, encopresis, anorexia nervosa, bulimia, transient tic disorder, Tourette's disorder, chronic motor or vocal tic disorder, alcohol abuse and dependence, substance abuse and dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder, and adjustment disorders), current use of sedative or psychotropic medication, current signs of or a history of fetal alcohol syndrome or exposure to heavy antenatal alcohol exposure, sensory impairment, history of traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness exceeding 10 minutes, presence of diseases that may affect the CNS (e.g., meningitis, epilepsy), HIV [tested using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)], less than 6 years of formal education, and lack of proficiency in English or Afrikaans. Prior to consent being obtained for participation in the study, a research social worker obtained collateral information from consenting parents, verifying the absence of medical, psychiatric and psychosocial problems. Participants in the two groups were matched for age (within 1 year), gender, language, socio-economic status and level of education (within 1 year). A total socio-economic status score was calculated by summing the category scores for family income (1-6), reversed employment category of participant's parent with the highest employment rank (Hollingshead reversed) (1-9), parent education (0-6), total assets (0-7), dwelling type (1-6) and bedroom cohabitation (1-7). During recruitment it was attempted to match the samples on smoking status, but this was not to be feasible since smoking was much more prevalent in the AUD participants. This positive association of smoking and alcohol use is well documented [35].

Measures

Substance use

A revised version of the Timeline Follow-back procedure (TLFB) [36], a semi-structured, clinician-administered assessment of lifetime history of alcohol use and drinking patterns (i.e., frequency, quantity and density of alcohol consumption, including every phase from when participants first started drinking at least once per month to the present, including all periods of abstinence) was used in combination with the K-SADS-PL to elicit alcohol-use data. It was administered by a Psychiatrist on the day of screening. A standard drink was defined as one beer or wine cooler (340 ml), one glass of wine (150 ml) or a 45 ml shot of liquor. A similar procedure was carried out for each substance that the research participant acknowledged using.

Anthropometry

Weights and heights were measured according to standard anthropometric techniques [37] by a trained research assistant. Weight was measured using a digital weighing scale (Camry ED-301, China) and shoes and heavy outer layers of clothing were removed. Height was measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer without shoes, caps and hats. Indices investigated were height-for-age (stunting) and BMI (weight/height2)-for-age (underweight and overweight/obesity). For comparison of anthropometric indices to reference data in developing countries, Z-scores derived from the reference data were used [38]. The recently released World Health Organisation (WHO) growth reference for ages 5 to 19 years [20] were used as reference data. Height-for-age, expressed in Z-scores of the WHO growth reference was used to define stunting (< -2 standard deviations (SD), and BMI-for-age, expressed in Z-scores of the WHO growth reference were used to define underweight (Z-score < -2 SD) and overweight and obesity (> +1 SD) [20] using WHO AnthroPlus, Version 1.0.4 for Windows [39]. In order to compare the anthropometric data with findings from the most recent YRBS [4], weight-for-age (underweight: Z-score < -2 SD) and height-for-age (stunting: Z-score < -2SD) were also expressed in Z-scores of the sex-specific 2000 CDC reference curves growth reference data [40] using the Nutrition module of Epi Info (TM) 3.5.3 [41]. As in the 2008 YRBS, the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) age-dependent BMI cut-off points for overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) were used to determine prevalence of overweight/obesity [42] for comparison purposes.

Physical activity

A questionnaire, administered by the primary researcher, was used to estimate active and sedentary time. Physical activity was assessed as time in minutes per week using regular, weekly 'organised sporting activities' such as scheduled training and competitions for sports (e.g. athletics and rugby). Physical inactivity was measured as time in minutes per week using 'television watching' and 'computer use'. Information for each of the three domains was elicited using three responses: participation: yes or no; if yes, number of occasions per week and minutes per occasion. The total minutes per week was calculated for each domain. The domain for physical activity represented total weekly active time (minutes) and the two domains for physical inactivity were added to obtain total weekly sedentary time (minutes).

Energy intake

Energy intake (kilojoules) was estimated by three repeated 24-hour recalls, which has been shown to be appropriate for quantifying dietary intake in developing countries [43, 44]. Furthermore, internal and external validity of this method has been found to be acceptable in adolescents aged ten years and older [45]. The 24-hour recall interviews were all conducted by the primary researcher, who was trained and standardised and knowledgeable on terminology and locally available food and beverages, on two non-consecutive week days and on one Monday to obtain Sunday intake. No data could be collected for Fridays and Saturdays as it was not feasible to conduct interviews on Saturdays and Sundays. Commonly used household measures and food pictures from the Dietary Assessment and Education Kit, developed by Steyn and Senekal [46], were used to assist with food portion size estimation. Estimated food portions were converted to grams using the the MRC Food Quantities Manual [47]. The energy consumption for each participant for each day was calculated using the South African Food Data System (SAFOODS) [48]. The average energy intake over the three 24-hour recall interviews was calculated to represent the observed intake distributions for energy (kilojoules). This energy intake variable did not include estimated energy from alcohol intake. Average daily alcohol energy intake was estimated from average daily alcohol intake (grams) per participant in the AUDs group as follows: The average daily alcohol intake (grams) was estimated from the alcohol-use data in the most recent phase of drinking as follows: 1) frequency of alcohol use (days per month) multiplied by average quantity of alcohol consumed (standard drinks per drinking day) to obtain average monthly standard drinks of alcohol consumed; 2) average monthly standard drinks of alcohol consumed was divided by 28 days to obtain average daily standard drinks of alcohol consumed; 3) average daily standard drinks of alcohol consumed was multiplied by 13.6 grams of alcohol per standard drink to obtain average daily alcohol intake in grams, which was converted to average daily alcohol energy (29 kilojoules per gram) to obtain average daily alcohol energy (kilojoules). Average daily alcohol energy was added daily energy intake from the observed intake distributions for each AUD participant to represent total estimated energy intake (kilojoules). Daily alcohol energy for the n = 48 light drinking control participants was not calculated as their alcohol life dose was negligible (mean 5.77 ± 12.46 standard drinks) and the contribution of alcohol energy to energy intake would therefore also be negligible.

Procedures

The Committee for Human Research of Stellenbosch University approved all study procedures (N06/07/128). After eligibility was established, written consent from parents and written assent from participants was obtained. Participants were transported from their homes or schools to the testing site. After physical and psychiatric screening, the participants completed demographic self-report questionnaires. On the day of screening after inclusion in the sample, weight and height measurements were taken, physical activity data was collected and the first 24-hour recall interview was conducted. The remaining two 24-hour recalls were done on a Monday and one other week day thereafter. Participants were compensated for their time with gift vouchers. Confidentiality of all study information was maintained with the exception of statutory reporting requirements in newly-identified or ongoing threats to the safety of minor participants.

Statistical analysis

All data were checked and cleaned before analysis. Descriptive statistics, including inspection of data for adherence to normal distributions, and group comparisons were computed using Stata/IC Version 11.1 for Windows [49]. Suitable transformations were applied to all variables with skewed distributions, as relevant. Mann Whitney U, chi-square and Fischer's exact tests were used to compare the socio-demographic and substance use variables between the Control and AUD groups. Statistical significance was defined at a level of p ≤ 0.05. Due to the paired nature of the data and possible confounding from the smoking imbalance between the Control and AUD groups, a multi-level mixed effects linear regression model was used to compare anthropometric indices of growth and weight status, physical activity and energy intake between the two groups. A pairing variable was created according to the matched pairs in the sample and served as the level variable in the model. Transformed outcome variables were used where relevant. Comparisons were done with adjustment for gender, smoking status, physical activity (total weekly active time) and total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy). Categorical physical activity variables (participate yes/no) were compared using the Chi-square or Fischer's exact tests. Prevalence of stunting, underweight and overweight/obesity using the WHO growth references were compared between the Control and AUD groups using the Chi-square and Fischer's exact tests.

After confirming that assumptions for regression analyses were met, relationships between anthropometric categories and AUD group membership were investigated for the total sample and within genders, using multi-level mixed effects logistic regression. Outcome variables were WHO anthropometric Z-score categories for stunting, underweight and overweight/obesity [20], and group status, gender, smoking status, physical activity and total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy) were entered as independent variables. The pairing variable served as the level variable.

Results

Demographic and substance use characteristics

A total of 184 adolescents were recruited and screened, of whom 22 were excluded as screen failures due to a range of exclusion criteria, including cannabis and methamphetamine use, and DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses, resulting in a final sample of 162. The Control and AUD groups were successfully matched for age, education level, gender, language, ethnicity and socio-economic status (Table 1). As expected, AUD adolescents had significantly greater alcohol exposure than controls (Table 1). There was no significant difference in age of onset of drinking and participants who had ever used alcohol started drinking around 12 years of age. Almost all (95%, n = 77) adolescents in the AUDs group had a 'weekends-only' style of alcohol consumption. The regular drinking frequency (days per month) and regular drinking quantity (standard drinks per month) indicates an average consumption of about 13 drinks per drinking day, which is indicative of a binge drinking pattern. A greater proportion of participants in the AUDs group smoked compared to the Control group, and lifetime tobacco dose (total number of cigarettes smoked in lifetime) was greater in the AUDs group; a significantly greater percentage of participants in the AUDs group had also experimented with cannabis. The results on cannabis and methamphetamine indicate very low use in both groups, with no other drug use, although cannabis use was significantly greater in the AUDs group compared to the Control group (Table 1).
Table 1

Confirmatory Analyses of Socio-demographic and Alcohol Grouping Measures and Substance use characteristics of the sample (n = 162)

 

Control Group

(n = 81)

AUDs Group

(n = 81)

  
 

M(SD) or %

M(SD) or %

U/χ2

p-value

Socio-demographics

    

   Age

14.76 (0.78)

14.92 (0.74)

-1.19

0.235

   Education level a

7.79 (0.85)

7.85 (0.74)

-0.43

0.666

   %Male

42

42

0.00

1.000

   %Female

58

58

  

   % Afrikaans-speaking

69

69

0.00

1.000

   %English-speaking

31

31

  

   % Mixed Ancestry

97.6

97.6

 

0.497

   % White

1.2

0

  

   % Black

1.2

0

  

   Total Socio-economic status score b

28.19 (5.80)

24.85 (5.93)

1.34

0.179

Alcohol Use

    

   % Never consumed alcohol

41

0

  

   % Never intoxicated

93

0

  

   %Light drinker c

59

0

  

   % Alcohol abuse d

 

2.5

  

   % Alcohol dependence e

 

97.5

  

% Weekends-only drinking style

in most recent drinking phase f

 

95

  

Drinking onset age (years) in

participants that have drunk alcohol

12.25 (1.66)

12.04 (1.70)

0.57

0.567

   Alcohol lifetime dose g

5.77 (12.46)

1493.69 (1511.53)

-11.04

< 0.001

   Age of first intoxication

 

12.83 (1.15)

  

   Age of onset of regular drinking

 

12.91 (1.11)

  

   Regular drinking duration (months)

 

23.78 (15.91)

  

Regular drinking frequency (days/month)

in most recent drinking phase

 

5.01 (2.87)

  

   Regular drinking quantity per month h

 

65.78 (57.96)

  

Tobacco Use

    

   % Never smoked tobacco

59

17

 

< 0.001

   % Light smokers (lifetime < 100 cigarettes)

35

31

  

   % Regular smokers (lifetime > 100 cigarettes)

6

52

  

   Smoking onset age (years) in light smokers

12.53 (1.62)

12.44 (1.96)

-0.19

0.846

   Smoking onset age (years) in regular smokers

13 (0.71)

12.36 (1.46)

0.96

0.339

   Lifetime tobacco dose of all smokers i

86.42 (442.80)

1417.59 (2762.60)

-7.02

< 0.001

Other Substance Use

    

   % Never used cannabis

89

42

34.35

< 0.001

   Lifetime cannabis dose j

0.12 (0.37)

4.08 (7.40)

-6.33

< 0.001

   % Never used methamphetamine

100

96

 

0.245

   Lifetime methamphetamine dose k

0

1.0 (0.56)

  

   % Never used any other drugs

100

100

  

Notes: For all variables not presented as percentages, means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. Continuous variables compared using the Mann Whitney U Test and categorical variables compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact test.

a Years of successfully completed education

b Total Socio-economic status score: Sum of Family income (1-6), Reversed employment category of participant's parent with the highest employment rank (Hollingshead reversed) (1-9), Parent education (0-6), Total assets (0-7), Dwelling type (1-6) and Bedroom cohabitation (1-7) - Maximum = 41

c Less than 100 standard drinks of alcohol consumed in lifetime

d Greater than 100 standard drinks of alcohol consumed in lifetime with a DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol abuse

e Greater than 100 standard drinks of alcohol consumed in lifetime with a DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence

f Style of drinking followed in the most recent phase of drinking

g Total number of standard drinks of alcohol consumed in lifetime

h Average standard drinks of alcohol consumed per month

i Total number of cigarettes smoked in lifetime

j Total number of 'joints' smoked in lifetime;

k Total number of 'straws' (hits) of methamphetamine in lifetime

Anthropometry, Physical Activity and Energy Intake

Complete anthropometric data sets were collected for 157 participants (Control group: n = 79, AUDs group: n = 78) and complete physical activity and energy intake data sets were collected for 160 participants (n = 80 per group). Heights and weights could not be obtained for 5 participants in the sample (Control group: n = 2, AUDs group: n = 3) and dietary intake and physical activity data could not be obtained for 2 participants (n = 1 per group). Weight, height, height-for-age and BMI-for-age, expressed in Z-scores of the WHO growth reference for ages 5 to 19 years [20], did not differ significantly between groups and there were no group by gender differences in height-for-age and BMI-for-age (Table 2). Females in the sample had a significantly greater BMI-for-age (z = 2.34; p = 0.019) compared to males when adjusting for group status, smoking status, physical activity and total estimated energy intake (including alcohol). A significant positive association was found between height-for-age and total estimated energy intake (z = 2.72; p = 0.007) when adjusting for group status, gender, smoking status and physical activity. No significant relationship was found between BMI-for-age and total estimated energy intake (z = 1.50; p = 0.132). Most participants in both groups had a height-for-age within the normal WHO reference range, with one male AUD participant having a height-for-age greater than +2SD. Body mass index- for-age was within the WHO normal reference range for approximately two thirds of participants in both groups. The proportion of stunted, thin and overweight/obese participants did not differ significantly between groups, and there was no gender by group interactions (Table 3). In both groups, more than double the numbers of females than males were overweight/obese (Table 3).
Table 2

Comparison of anthropometry, physical activity and energy intake between Control and AUD groups

 

Control Group

AUDs Group

  
  

%

 

%

p-value

z

Anthropometry

      

Weight (kg)

52 (46-62)

 

53 (46-62)

 

0.745

-0.32

Height (m)

1.60 (1.56-1.65)

 

1.60 (1.53-1.65)

 

0.487

0.70

Height-for-age Z-score

-0.58 (1.03)

 

-0.59 (1.01)

 

0.672

0.42

   Males

-0.73 (1.07)

 

-0.45 (1.14)

 

0.348

0.94

   Females

-0.47 (0.99)

 

-0.69 (0.89)

 

0.673

-0.42

Body mass index-for-age Z-score

0.29 (1.42)

 

0.25 (1.38)

 

0.821

-0.23

   Males

0.12 (1.52)

 

-0.11 (1.42)

 

0.219

-1.23

   Females

0.41 (1.34)

 

0.52 (1.31)

 

0.327

0.98

Physical activity and inactivity

      

Participate in physical activities (%yes) *

 

33

 

33

  

   Males (%yes) *

 

48

 

39

  

   Females (%yes) *

 

21

 

28

  

Total weekly active time (minutes) a

0 (0-120)

 

0 (0-120)

 

0.740

-0.33

   Males: weekly active time

0 (0-240)

 

0 (0-240)

 

0.382

-0.87

   Females: weekly active time

0 (0-0)

 

0 (0-60)

 

0.690

0.40

Participate in sedentary activities (%yes) *

 

100

 

99

  

Total weekly sedentary time (minutes) b

1001 (570)

 

1091 (569)

 

0.949

0.06

   Males: weekly sedentary time

937 (590)

 

1093 (561)

 

0.349

0.94

   Females: weekly sedentary time

1047 (558)

 

1089 (580)

 

0.327

-0.98

Energy intake

      

Energy (kilojoules), excluding alcohol energy c

8965 (7240-10661)

 

10063 (8245-11683)

 

0.047

1.98

   Males: energy excluding alcohol

9461 (8010-10835)

 

11206 (9622-12496)

 

0.034

2.11

   Females: energy excluding alcohol

8342 (7003-9944)

 

9291 (7923-10941)

 

0.254

1.14

Total estimated energy (kilojoules), including alcohol energy d

8965 (7240-10661)

 

11028 (9072-13014)

 

< 0.001

4.20

   Males: energy including alcohol

9461 (8010-10835)

 

11684 (10181-13521)

 

< 0.001

3.69

   Females: energy including alcohol

8342 (7003-9944)

 

10481 (8847-11726)

 

0.005

2.81

Notes: Variables are median and interquartile range except for height-for-age Z-score, body mass index-for-age Z-score, total weekly sedentary time, which are mean and standard deviation

n-values: Anthropometry: Control n = 79; AUDs n = 79; Physical activity and inactivity and Energy intake: n = 80 per group; males n = 33 and females n = 47

Height-for-age and body mass index-for-age expressed in Z-scores of the World Health Organisation Growth Reference for ages 5 to 19 years [20]

Smoking group includes light smokers (lifetime < 100 cigarettes) and regular smokers (lifetime > 100 cigarettes)

Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression used to compare groups, adjusting for gender, smoking status, physical activity (total weekly active time) and total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy)

a Total weekly active time: sum of minutes per week spent doing regular (weekly) organised sporting activities

b Total weekly sedentary time: sum in minutes per week spent watching television and using a computer

c Energy intake, excluding estimated average daily alcohol energy

d Total estimated energy intake, including average daily alcohol energy estimated from average daily alcohol intake (grams) per participant in the alcohol use disorder group

* No significant differences between Control and AUD groups using χ2 or Fischer's exact test

Table 3

Comparison of height-for-age and body mass index-for-age according to WHO Growth References (5-19 years) Z-score cut-offs in Control (n = 79) and AUD (n = 78) groups and by gender between groups

 

Groups*

Males*

Females*

 

%Control

n

%AUDs

n

%Control

n

%AUDs

n

%Control

n

%AUDs

n

Height-for-Age

      

   Stunting < -2SD

10.1

8

6.4

5

11.8

4

9.1

3

8.9

4

4.4

2

Body mass index-for-Age

      

   Underweight < -2SD

5.1

4

2.6

2

8.8

3

3.0

1

2.2

1

2.2

1

   Overweight and Obese > +1SD

25.3

20

29.5

23

17.7

6

18.2

6

31.1

14

37.8

17

Notes: Body mass index (kg/m2), calculated by dividing weight (kilograms) by height (meters) squared

n-values: Control group: n = 34 males and n = 45 females; AUDs Group: n = 33 males and n = 45 females

* No significant differences between Control and AUD groups or by gender between groups using χ2 or Fischer's exact tests

No significant differences in the number of participants engaging in organised sports (active time) were found in the total sample, nor was there a group by gender interaction (Table 2). There was also no significant difference in the total weekly active time between groups or by gender (Table 2). All participants in the sample, excepting one in the AUDs group, participated in sedentary time activities, with no differences in total weekly sedentary time between groups nor any group by gender interactions (Table 2).

Daily energy intake, excluding alcohol energy, was significantly higher in the AUD adolescents compared to the control adolescents for the entire group, and for males, but not for females. However, when estimated alcohol energy was added, energy intake in the AUD participants was significantly higher for both males and females (Table 2)

Mixed effects logistic regression showed an increased odds ratio (OR 1.26) of AUD participants being overweight/obese when compared to control participants, after adjusting for gender, smoking status, physical activity (total weekly active time) and total estimated energy intake. Within the total sample, females had an increased odds ratio (OR 2.60) of being overweight/obese compared to males with adjustment for group status, smoking, physical activity and total estimated energy intake. Females with AUDs had a greater odds ratio (OR 2.42) compared to males of being overweight/obese, adjusting for smoking status, physical activity and total estimated energy intake, while no increased odds ratio was found for males with AUDs (OR 0.76) (Table 4).
Table 4

Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression with overweight/obesity

 

Odds Ratio

p-value

95% CI

Overweight/Obesity: Body mass index-for-age Z-score > +1SD

   

Control Group

1.00

   

AUDs Group

1.26

0.647

0.46

3.41

Males

1.00

   

Females

2.61

0.053

0.99

6.87

Non-smoking

1.00

   

Smoking

0.69

0.498

0.23

2.03

Total weekly active time

1.00

0.387

1.00

1.00

Total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy)

1.00

   

MALES: Overweight/Obesity: Body mass index-for-age Z -score > +1SD

   

Control Group

1.00

   

AUDs Group

0.75

0.720

0.16

3.48

Non-smoking

1.00

   

Smoking

1.04

0.967

0.17

6.31

Total weekly active time

1.00

0.345

0.99

1.00

Total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy)

1.00

0.075

1.00

1.00

FEMALES: Overweight/Obesity: Body mass index-for-age Z -score > +1SD

   

Control Group

1.00

   

AUDs Group

2.42

0.190

0.65

9.02

Non-smoking

1.00

   

Smoking

0.43

0.248

0.10

1.81

Total weekly active time

1.00

0.685

1.00

1.00

Total estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy)

1.00

0.025

1.00

1.00

Notes: Smoking group includes light smokers (lifetime < 100 cigarettes) and regular smokers (lifetime > 100 cigarettes)

Control group n = 79 (males n = 34 and females n = 45); AUDs group n = 78 (males n = 33 and females: n = 45)

Discussion

The results of this study show that the growth and weight status of a group of healthy, treatment-naive adolescents with "pure" AUDs (without comorbid substance use disorders or comorbid psychiatric, including externalising, disorders) is comparable to a matched group of light/non-drinking control adolescents and is in line with the growth and weight status of the South African adolescent population. There were a greater proportion of overweight/obese females in both groups compared to males, with this percentage being slightly greater, although not significantly so, in the AUDs group. Our analyses suggest that within this developing country setting, adolescent females with AUDs have an increased risk of being overweight/obese compared to adolescent females without AUDs, adjusting for smoking, physical activity and estimated energy intake (including alcohol energy).

When using the recommended WHO growth reference for ages 5 to 19 years, weight, height, height-for-age Z-scores and BMI-for-age Z-scores did not differ significantly between the Control and AUD groups, and a similar prevalence of stunting, underweight and overweight and obesity were found in the groups. These anthropometric findings were compared to the findings of the 2008 YRBS [4], in order to contextualise the findings within the South African adolescent population (Table 5). Stunting and underweight in both groups in our sample were lower than the YRBS prevalence nationally and in the mixed ancestry population, but similar to the stunting prevalence in the Western Cape Province. In the AUDs group, overweight and obesity prevalence was greater than in the YRBS national, provincial and Mixed Ancestry population prevalence, while Control group prevalence was similar to the YRBS proportions [4]. With the same anthropometric references used in the YRBS, more overweight/obesity in the AUDs group compared to the controls was evident, with higher prevalence in females in both groups, particularly within the AUDs group (Table 5). All indices point to the fact that prevalence of overnutrition exceeded undernutrition in this sample. Female AUD participants showed an increased risk for overweight/obesity (OR = 2.42). However, studies in larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.
Table 5

Comparison of prevalence of underweight and stunting in Control (n = 79) and AUDs (n = 78) groups with 2008 Youth Risk Behaviour Survey findings in the Western Cape Province (WC) (n = 1159), nationally (n = 9862) and for mixed ancestry population (n = 1423)

 

Groups

YRBS

 

% Control

% Males

%Females

%AUDs

%Males

%Females

%WC

%Males

%Females

%National

%Males

%Females

%Mixed

Ancestry

Stunting: Height-for-age Z -score < -2SD

8.9

8.8

8.9

10.3

9.1

11.1

9.7

9.8

9.6

13.1

15.2

11.1

13.6

Underweight: Weight-for-age Z -score < -2SD

7.6

11.8

4.4

6.4

9.1

4.4

6.5

8.0

5.2

8.4

12.0

4.9

9.4

Overweight and obese: Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m

22.8

17.7

26.7

29.5

18.2

37.8

25.5

13.7

36.3

25.0

14.5

35.0

22.4

Notes: Height-for-age and Weight-for-age according to gender-specific 2000 CDC reference [40]Z-score cut-offs (Epi Info (TM) 3.5.3) used in 2008 Youth Risk Behaviour Survey [4]

Body mass index according to International Obesity Task Force cut-offs for body mass index for overweight and obesity by gender for ages 2 to 18 years [42] used in 2008 Youth Risk Behaviour Survey [4]

AUDs: alcohol use disorders

Participation in physical activity was low in both groups with only a third of adolescents participating in any organised sporting activities. Average weekly active time, represented by organised regular sporting activities, was not significantly different between groups (Control group: median = 0; mean = 83 minutes; AUDs group: median = 0, mean = 104 minutes). Physical activity in both groups was well below the WHO global recommendation for physical activity (five to 17 year olds) of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily [50]. It is possible that informal recreational activity such as dancing and playing sport with friends may contribute to activity levels in adolescents who are recreationally active on a regular basis. However, these low physical activity levels are in line with YRBS findings that show widespread inadequate levels of physical activity, especially in the Western Cape and among females [4, 10]. This inactivity may contribute to positive energy balance and the observed overweight/obesity prevalence.

Based on the predominance of sedentary behaviour in the total sample, the daily estimated energy requirement (EER) for sedentary adolescents (aged 15 years) was used for interpretation of energy intake data (males: 9337 kilojoules per day, females: 7270 kilojoules per day; and weighted average EER for males and females for total sample: 8138 kilojoules per day) [51]. Total estimated energy intake (including alcohol) for the AUDs group was considerably greater than the EER for sedentary adolescents (weighted average EER as mentioned above), whereas that of the Control group was only slightly greater than the weighted average EER. Total estimated energy intake in females in the Control group and in both genders in the AUDs group exceeded sedentary EERs for females and males aged 15 years. As expected, total estimated energy intake (including alcohol) was significantly greater in the AUDs group compared to the Control group, since energy intake before the addition of alcohol energy was significantly higher in the AUDs group compared to the controls. This suggests that when compared to adolescents without AUDs, adolescents with AUDs may have higher intakes of energy, possibly due to energy-dense food choices, which is then further increased by added alcohol energy. It therefore seems reasonable to suggest that heavy drinking adolescents are ingesting alcohol energy in addition to usual food and beverage energy, resulting in diets high in total energy. Previous research showed that adolescents with AUDs were less likely to eat a balanced diet [52] and that adolescent alcohol and tobacco use is associated with consumption of energy-dense snacks and beverages [27, 30]. A recent study reported that earlier alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, depression, increased fighting and reduced optimism may lead to unhealthy increases in weight [53]. The inherent limitations of recall data for alcohol use, energy intake and physical activity are applicable to this study and the results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.

The higher frequency and risk of overweight/obesity in female adolescents as a whole, while being more pronounced in the AUD females, is particularly relevant in view of obesity development being linked to four critical periods, namely intrauterine life, infancy, the period of adiposity rebound (ages 5 to 7 y), and adolescence [54] and since the transition from adolescence to early adulthood is a period characterised by considerable increase in obesity incidence [55]. These findings become more pertinent in view of the substantial evidence that risk behaviours, such as alcohol use [56] and weight status [57] show a strong degree of tracking from adolescence into adulthood. Longitudinal data also shows that low physical activity in adolescence tracks into adulthood [58]. In addition, the odds of overweight/obese adolescents reporting a diagnosis for two cardiovascular risk factors by young adulthood is 1.5 to 2 times higher than for normal-weight adolescents, regardless of BMI in young adulthood [59]. Furthermore, physical inactivity [60] and smoking [61] have been shown to predict future obesity, in particular abdominal ("high risk") obesity by early adulthood. These adolescent behaviour patterns are therefore not transient in nature and are likely to have important impacts on long-term behaviour patterns and health outcomes. Overweight/obesity results in a considerable burden of death, premature death and disability in adult South African's [62], and is very much in line with the growing pandemic worldwide in developed as well as developing countries. This trend seems unlikely to be reversed as developing countries continue to struggle with the widespread availability of nutritionally poor, but cheap foods.

Conclusion

In this cross-sectional comparison, anthropometric indices of growth and weight status of participants in the Control and AUD groups were generally comparable. However, there is an indication that adolescent females with AUDs may have an increased risk for being overweight/obese compared to similar adolescent females without these disorders within this developing setting. Moreover, the presence of an AUD in this adolescent sample was associated with higher energy intake, likely due to greater intakes of energy-dense food choices, exacerbated by added alcohol energy. This result is consistent with the literature suggesting that heavy alcohol use is associated with unhealthy increases in weight. The persistence of these patterns has the potential to initiate early development of nutrition-related chronic diseases and burdens in adulthood. These findings need further exploration in longitudinal, well-controlled studies, in order to elucidate the impacts of heavy alcohol use on energy balance, growth and weight status in adolescents as they age. This assessment of growth and weight status in adolescents with AUDs contributes to the understanding of possible impacts of heavy alcohol consumption on important aspects of adolescent development.

List of abbreviations

AUDs: 

Alcohol Use Disorders

BMI: 

Body mass index

DSM-IV: 

American Psychiatric Association's 4th Diagnostic and Statistical Manual

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

EER: 

Estimated Energy Requirement

K-SADS-PL: 

Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (6-18 Years) Lifetime Version

MRC: 

Medical Research Council

TLFB: 

Timeline Follow-back procedure

SAFOODS: 

South African Food Data System

SSAGA-II: 

Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcohol (SSAGA-II)

SUDs: 

Substance Use Disorders

WHO: 

World Health Organization

YRBS: 

Youth Risk Behaviour Survey

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH grant RO1 AA016303-01 (PI: G. Fein).

The authors would like to express gratitude to Helen Ferrett for study management, Patsy Thomson and Marwyn Sowden for data entry and checking, Barenise Alexander for participant recruitment, and schools and participants from the Western Cape Education Department for their cooperation and participation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University
(2)
Division of Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town
(3)
Biostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa
(4)
Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University
(5)
Neurobehavioral Research Inc

References

  1. McArdle P: Alcohol abuse in adolescents. Arch Dis Child. 2008, 93: 524-527. 10.1136/adc.2007.115840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Miller JW, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Jones SE: Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics. 2007, 119: 76-85. 10.1542/peds.2006-1517.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Parry CDH, Myers B, Morojele NK, Flisher AJ, Bhana A, Donson H, Pluddemann A: Trends in adolescent alcohol and other drug use: findings from three sentinel sites in South Africa (1997-2001). J Adolesc. 2004, 27: 429-440. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.11.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reddy SP, James S, Sewpaul R, Koopmam F, Funani NI, Sifunda S, Josie J, Masuka P, Kambaran NS, Omardien RG: Umthente Uhlaba Usamila - The South African Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2008. 2010, Cape Town: South African Medical Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  5. Hill KG, White HR, Chung IJ, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF: Early adult outcomes of adolescent binge drinking: person- and variable-centered analyses of binge drinking trajectories. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000, 24: 892-901. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02071.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Valois RF, McKeown RE, Garrison CZ, Vincent ML: Correlates of aggressive and violent behaviors among public high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1995, 16: 26-34. 10.1016/1054-139X(95)94070-O.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Viner RM, Taylor B: Adult outcomes of binge drinking in adolescence: findings from a UK national birth cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007, 61: 902-907. 10.1136/jech.2005.038117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Pletcher MJ, Varosy P, Kiefe CI, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Hulley SB: Alcohol consumption, binge drinking, and early coronary calcification: findings from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 161: 423-433. 10.1093/aje/kwi062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Matthews DB: Adolescence and alcohol: recent advances in understanding the impact of alcohol use during a critical developmental window. Alcohol. 2010, 44: 1-2. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Reddy SP, Panday S, Swart D, Jinabhai CC, Amosun SL, James S, Monyeki KD, Stevens G, Morejele N, Kambaran NS, et al: Umthenthe Uhlaba Usamila - The South African Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2002. 2003, Cape Town: South African Medical Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organisation: Nutrition in adolescence: issues and challenges for the health sector (Issues in adolescent health and development). WHO discussion papers on adolescence. 2005, Geneva: World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerr MA, Rennie KL, McCaffrey TA, Wallace JM, Hannon-Fletcher MP, Livingstone MB: Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005. Br J Nutr. 2009, 101: 122-131. 10.1017/S0007114508994769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreno LA, Rodriguez G, Fleta J, Bueno-Lozano M, Lazaro A, Bueno G: Trends of dietary habits in adolescents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010, 50: 106-112. 10.1080/10408390903467480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Briefel RR, Wilson A, Gleason PM: Consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages at school, home, and other locations among school lunch participants and nonparticipants. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009, 109: S79-90. 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgess-Champoux TL, Larson N, Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Story M: Are family meal patterns associated with overall diet quality during the transition from early to middle adolescence?. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009, 41: 79-86. 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.03.113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li M, Dibley MJ, Sibbritt DW, Yan H: Dietary habits and overweight/obesity in adolescents in Xi'an City, China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010, 19: 76-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Venter I, Winterbach A: Dietary fat knowledge and intake of mid-adolescents attending public schools in the Bellville/Durbanville area of the Western Cape Province. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010, 23: 75-83.Google Scholar
  18. Temple NJ, Steyn NP, Myburgh NG, Nel JH: Food items consumed by students attending schools in different socioeconomic areas in Cape Town, South Africa. Nutrition. 2006, 22: 252-258. 10.1016/j.nut.2005.07.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieber CS: Relationships between nutrition, alcohol use, and liver disease. Alcohol Res Health. 2003, 27: 220-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Onis Md, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J: Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007, 85: 660-667. 10.2471/BLT.07.043497.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Shrimpton R, Victora CG, de Onis M, Lima RC, Blossner M, Clugston G: Worldwide timing of growth faltering: implications for nutritional interventions. Pediatrics. 2001, 107: E75-10.1542/peds.107.5.e75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeomans MR: Alcohol, appetite and energy balance: is alcohol intake a risk factor for obesity?. Physiol Behav. 2010, 100: 82-89. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kent LM, Worsley A: Trends in BMI, diet and lifestyle between 1976 and 2005 in North Sydney. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2009, 18: 453-461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schroder H, Morales-Molina JA, Bermejo S, Barral D, Mandoli ES, Grau M, Guxens M, de Jaime Gil E, Alvarez MD, Marrugat J: Relationship of abdominal obesity with alcohol consumption at population scale. Eur J Nutr. 2007, 46: 369-376. 10.1007/s00394-007-0674-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH: Alcohol and adiposity: effects of quantity and type of drink and time relation with meals. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29: 1436-1444. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Oesterle S, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Guo J, Catalano RF, Abbott RD: Adolescent heavy episodic drinking trajectories and health in young adulthood. J Stud Alcohol. 2004, 65: 204-212.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenberg ME, Olson RE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Bearinger LH: Correlations between family meals and psychosocial well-being among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004, 158: 792-796. 10.1001/archpedi.158.8.792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keski-Rahkonen A, Kaprio J, Rissanen A, Virkkunen M, Rose RJ: Breakfast skipping and health-compromising behaviors in adolescents and adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003, 57: 842-853. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Toporoff E, Himes JH, Resnick MD, Blum RW: Covariations of eating behaviors with other health-related behaviors among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1997, 20: 450-458. 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00279-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nutbeam D, Aaro L, Wold B: The lifestyle concept and health education with young people. Results from a WHO international survey. World Health Stat Q. 1991, 44: 55-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendez MA, Monteiro CA, Popkin BM: Overweight exceeds underweight among women in most developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 714-721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Ryan N: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (6-18 years) Lifetime Version. 1996Google Scholar
  33. Bucholz KK, Cadoret R, Cloninger CR, Dinwiddie SH, Hesselbrock VM, Nurnberger JI, Reich T, Schmidt I, Schuckit MA: A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J Stud Alcohol. 1994, 55: 149-158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Revision. 1994, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson NI, Story M, Perry CL, Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ: Are diet and physical activity patterns related to cigarette smoking in adolescents? Findings from Project EAT. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007, 4: A51-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Sobell LC, Sobell MC: Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods. Edited by: Raye Z, Litten JPA. 1992, Totowa, NJ: Human Press, IncGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organisation: Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Series. 1995, Geneva: World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  38. Gibson RS: Evaluation of Anthropometric Indices. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Edited by: Gibson RS. 2005, 335-352. SecondGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organisation: WHO AnthroPlus Version 1.0.4 for Windows.
  40. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Gou SS, Wei R, Mie Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Hohnson CL: CDC growth charts: United States. Advance data from vital and health statistics. 2000, Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Epi Info (TM) 3.5.3.
  42. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gibson RS: Introduction. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Edited by: Gibson RS. 2005, New York: Oxford University Press, 1-26. SecondGoogle Scholar
  44. Gibson RS: Reproducibility in dietary assessment. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Edited by: Gibson RS. 2005, New York: Oxford University Press, 129-148. SecondGoogle Scholar
  45. Biro G, Hulshof KF, Ovesen L, Amorim Cruz JA: Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002, 56 (Suppl 2): S25-32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Steyn NP, Senekal M: Dietary Assessment and Education Kit (DAEK). Chronic Diseases of Lifestyle Unit MRC ed. 2004, Cape Town: South African Medical Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  47. Langenhoven ML, Conradie PJ, Wolmarans P, Faber M: MRC Food Quantities Manual. 1991, Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2Google Scholar
  48. Medical Research Council: Foodfinder III: Dietary analysis software. 2002Google Scholar
  49. Statacorp LP: Stata/IC Version 11.1 for Windows. 2009Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organisation: Global Recommendations on Physical activity for Health: 5-17 year olds. 2011, Geneva: Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  51. Institute of Medicine FaNB: Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). 2002, Washington, DC: National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Thatcher DL, Clark DB: Cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents with alcohol use disorders. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2006, 18: 151-157. 10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.1.151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pasch KE, Nelson MC, Lytle LA, Moe SG, Perry CL: Adoption of risk-related factors through early adolescence: associations with weight status and implications for causal mechanisms. J Adolesc Health. 2008, 43: 387-393. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Dietz WH: Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994, 59: 955-959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Nelson MC, Popkin BM: Five-year obesity incidence in the transition period between adolescence and adulthood: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 80: 569-575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Grant BF: Age at smoking onset and its association with alcohol consumption and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. J Subst Abuse. 1998, 10: 59-73. 10.1016/S0899-3289(99)80141-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T: Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med. 1993, 22: 167-177. 10.1006/pmed.1993.1014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Popkin BM: Longitudinal physical activity and sedentary behavior trends: adolescence to adulthood. Am J Prev Med. 2004, 27: 277-283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ford CA, Nonnemaker JM, Wirth KE: The influence of adolescent body mass index, physical activity, and tobacco use on blood pressure and cholesterol in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2008, 43: 576-583. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pietilainen KH, Kaprio J, Borg P, Plasqui G, Yki-Jarvinen H, Kujala UM, Rose RJ, Westerterp KR, Rissanen A: Physical inactivity and obesity: a vicious circle. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008, 16: 409-414. 10.1038/oby.2007.72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Saarni SE, Pietilainen K, Kantonen S, Rissanen A, Kaprio J: Association of smoking in adolescence with abdominal obesity in adulthood: a follow-up study of 5 birth cohorts of Finnish twins. Am J Public Health. 2009, 99: 348-354. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123851.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Joubert J, Norman R, Bradshaw D, Goedecke JH, Steyn NP, Puoane T, South African Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group: Estimating the burden of disease attributable to excess body weight in South Africa in 2000. South African Medical Journal. 2007, 97: 683-690.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Naude et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement