Mn bioavailability by polarized Caco-2 cells: comparison between Mn gluconate and Mn oxyprolinate
© Foglieni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 24 December 2010
Accepted: 25 July 2011
Published: 25 July 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Dec 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elad Tako|
|15 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marina Ferrarini|
|28 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Elena Ferrero|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elad Tako|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marina Ferrarini|
|7 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Elena Ferrero|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Elena Ferrero|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Jul 2011||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jul 2011||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-10-77|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.