Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Socio-economic status, racial composition and the affordability of fresh fruits and vegetables in neighborhoods of a large rural region in Texas

  • Richard A Dunn1,
  • Joseph R Sharkey2Email author,
  • Justus Lotade-Manje1,
  • Yasser Bouhlal1 and
  • Rodolfo M NaygaJr3
Nutrition Journal201110:6

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-6

Received: 10 October 2010

Accepted: 18 January 2011

Published: 18 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Sharkey
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Liese
30 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dianna Smith
25 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Sharkey
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dianna Smith
10 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Liese
17 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Joseph Sharkey
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-10-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
(2)
Program for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center
(3)
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas

Advertisement