Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Misleading measures in Vitamin D analysis: A novel LC-MS/MS assay to account for epimers and isobars

  • Iltaf Shah1,
  • Ricky James1,
  • James Barker2,
  • Andrea Petroczi1 and
  • Declan P Naughton1Email author
Nutrition Journal201110:46

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-46

Received: 29 January 2011

Accepted: 14 May 2011

Published: 14 May 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naji Tabet
28 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - RJ Singh
14 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Walker
4 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Declan Naughton
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Walker
6 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Declan Naughton
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 May 2011 Editorially accepted
14 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-10-46

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Life Sciences, Kingston University
(2)
School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University

Advertisement