Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lack of effect of high-protein vs. highcarbohydrate meal intake on stress-related mood and eating behavior

  • Sofie G Lemmens1, 2Email author,
  • Eveline A Martens1, 2,
  • Jurriaan M Born1, 2,
  • Mieke J Martens1, 2 and
  • Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga1, 2
Nutrition Journal201110:136

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-136

Received: 11 May 2011

Accepted: 12 December 2011

Published: 12 December 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
11 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
24 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Levitsky
25 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen Melanson
14 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sofie Lemmens
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen Melanson
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
12 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-10-136

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Top Institute Food and Nutrition
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University