Bioactive oat β-glucan reduces LDL cholesterol in Caucasians and non-Caucasians

  • Thomas MS Wolever1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Alison L Gibbs2,

      Affiliated with

      • Jennie Brand-Miller3,

        Affiliated with

        • Alison M Duncan4,

          Affiliated with

          • Valerie Hart5,

            Affiliated with

            • Benoît Lamarche6,

              Affiliated with

              • Susan M Tosh7 and

                Affiliated with

                • Ruedi Duss8

                  Affiliated with

                  Nutrition Journal201110:130

                  DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-130

                  Received: 4 July 2011

                  Accepted: 25 November 2011

                  Published: 25 November 2011

                  Abstract

                  Background

                  There is increasing global acceptance that viscous soluble fibers lower serum LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), but most evidence for this comes from studies in Caucasians. To see if oat β-glucan lowers LDL-C in Caucasians and non-Caucasians we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial whose primary aim was to determine if molecular-weight (MW) influenced the LDL-C-lowering effect of oat β-glucan.

                  Results

                  Caucasian and non-Caucasian subjects with LDL-C-C ≥ 3.0 and ≤ 5.0 mmol/L (n = 786 screened, n = 400 ineligible, n = 19 refused, n = 367 randomized, n = 345 completed, n = 1 excluded for missing ethnicity) were randomly assigned to consume cereal containing wheat-fiber (Control, n = 74:13 Caucasian:non-Caucasian) or 3 g high-MW (3H, 2,250,000 g/mol, n = 67:19), 4 g medium-MW (4 M, 850,000 g/mol, n = 50:17), 3 g medium-MW (3M, 530,000 g/mol, n = 54:9) or 4 g low-MW (4 L, 210,000 g/mol, n = 51:12) oat β-glucan daily for 4 weeks. LDL-C after 4 weeks was influenced by baseline LDL-C (p < 0.001) and treatment (p = 0.003), but not ethnicity (p = 0.74). In all subjects, compared to control, 3 H, 4 M and 3 M reduced LDL-C significantly by 4.8 to 6.5%, but 4 L had no effect. Compared to control, the bioactive oat β-glucan treatments (3H, 4M and 3M) reduced LDL-C by a combined mean (95% CI) of 0.18 (0.06, 0.31) mmol/L (4.8%, n = 171, p = 0.004) in Caucasians, a value not significantly different from the 0.37 (0.09, 0.65) mmol/L (10.3%, n = 45, p = 0.008) reduction in non-Caucasians.

                  Conclusion

                  We conclude that oat β-glucan reduces LDL-C in both Caucasians and non-Caucasians; there was insufficient power to determine if the magnitude of LDL-C-lowering differed by ethnicity.

                  Trial Registration

                  ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981981

                  Keywords

                  Randomized clinical trial oats beta-glucan ethnicity cholesterol

                  Introduction

                  Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally [1, 2]. It is well established that reducing serum low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces risk for CHD [3]. Lifestyle modifications to reduce CHD risk include increased consumption of viscous soluble dietary fiber [4]. Oats are a good source of soluble fiber, the major component of which is (1→3)(1→4)-β-D-glucan, or β-glucan. Many, but not all studies have shown that oat-containing food products reduce serum LDL-C [5]. We showed that the LDL-C-lowering effect of oat β-glucan depended on its viscosity [6] which, in turn, depends on molecular weight (MW) and solubility [7]; 3-4 g/d of oat β-glucan with MW ranging from 5.3 × 105 to 2.2 × 106 g/mol significantly reduced LDL-C by 4.8 to 6.5%, but 4 g/d of oat β-glucan with MW 2.1 × 105 g/mol had no significant effect [6]. Since there is evidence that the prevalence of blood lipid abnormalities and other CHD risk factors varies in different ethnic groups [8] and that the LDL-C-lowering effect of statins differs by ethnicity [9, 10], we examined our data to see if the effect of oat β-glucan on LDL-C varied by ethnicity.

                  Methods

                  The methodology and main results of the trial have been reported elsewhere [6]. Briefly, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, parallel design, controlled clinical trial at 2 contract-research-organizations and 3 university nutrition research centers. Participants were healthy men and women aged 35 to 70 yr with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 40.0 kg/m2 and fasting serum LDL-C ≥ 3.0 and ≤5.0 mmol/L; 786 subjects were screened, 400 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 19 declined to participate, 367 were randomly assigned to one of the 5 treatments and 22 discontinued treatment before the end of the trial. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The protocol was approved by the ethics review committee at each participating institution. The trial was registered at http://​www.​clinicaltrials.​gov with identifier number NCT00981981.

                  After eligibility had been determined subjects, stratified by center and by LDL-C (stratum; low, 3.0 ≤ LDL-C ≤ 3.8 mmol/L; or high, 3.8 < LDL-C ≤ 5.0 mmol/L), were randomly assigned to receive a ready-to-eat wheat bran cereal (Control), or oat cereal providing a total of 3 g High-MW (3 H, MW = 22.5 × 105 g/mol), 4 g Medium-MW (4 M, MW = 8.5 × 105 g/mol), 3 g Medium-MW (3 M, MW = 5.3 × 105 g/mol) or 4 g Low-MW (4 L, MW = 2.1 × 105 g/mol) oat β-glucan per day for 4 weeks. Cereals were packed into air-tight foil sachets each containing half the daily dose (10-14 g) and labelled with a code. After the baseline blood sample, subjects were given a 1-week supply (14 sachets) of their assigned cereal and instructed to consume 2 sachets daily, one with breakfast and one with another meal or snack. Otherwise, subjects maintained their usual diets and other lifestyle habits throughout the study. The daily dose of cereals contained 234-339 kJ, 3-4 g protein, 1 g fat, 9-13 g carbohydrate and 6-8 g total fiber [6]. Fasting blood was obtained weekly for analysis of total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and calculated LDL-C.

                  Here we report the results for LDL-C in subjects based on their ethnicity. Ethnicity was determined based on the subjects' own classification of themselves as Caucasian, Black, Aboriginal, South Asian, Arab/West Asian, Filipino, South East Asian, Hispanic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean or other. Since the number of subjects in each non-Caucasian category was too small for meaningful comparisons, for the purposes of this analysis, subjects were classified as either Caucasian or non-Caucasian.

                  Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (SAS 9.2, XP-Pro, 2002-2008, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) on an intent-to-treat basis using all available data from the 366 subjects randomly assigned to treatments and whose ethnicity could be identified (one of the 367 randomized subjects was excluded for missing data on ethnicity). For all 5 treatments, the main effects of treatment and ethnicity and the treatment × ethnicity interaction on week 4 LDL-C was examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for baseline LDL-C and stratum; the effects of sex, center, age, waist circumference and BMI were tested but not included in the final model because they had no significant effect (P > 0.1). Post hoc testing was performed after demonstration of significant heterogeneity by ANCOVA using Fisher's LSD. The criterion for declaring a statistically significant difference was 2-tailed p < 0.05.

                  Results

                  The 296 Caucasian participants were older than the 70 non-Caucasians but were similar in sex, BMI and blood lipids at baseline (Table 1). The total number (% non-Caucasian), respectively, assigned to the 5 treatments were: Control, 87 (15%); 3 H, 86 (22%), 4 M, 67 (25%); 3 M, 63 (14%), and 4 L 63 (19%) (p = 0.39). For most, but not all, treatments, LDL-C tended to respond within 1-2 weeks of starting treatment and remain stable over the last 2 weeks of the study (Figure 1). The results for ANCOVA for LDL-C at week 4 showed significant effects of baseline LDL-C (p < 0.001), stratum (p < 0.001) and treatment (p = 0.003) but no significant effect of ethnicity (p = 0.74) and no treatment × ethnicity interaction (p = 0.34). The latter indicates that the effects of the 5 treatments on LDL-C did not differ significantly in Caucasians vs non-Caucasians. Compared to Control, 3 H and 4 M reduced LDL-C significantly in Caucasians and 3 H, 3 M and 4 M reduced LDL-C significantly in non-Caucasians (Figure 2). 4 L had no effect in either group. When the results of the bioactive treatments (3 H, 4 M and 3 M) were pooled and compared to control, bioactive oat β-glucan reduced LDL-C by a mean (95% CI) of 0.18 (0.06, 0.31) mmol/L (4.8%, p = 0.004) in Caucasians and by 0.37 (0.09, 0.65) mmol/L (10.3%, p = 0.008) in non-Caucasians; the difference between Caucasians and non-Caucasians was not significant (p = 0.24).
                  Table 1

                  Characteristics of Caucasian and Non-Caucasian subjects at baseline.

                   

                  Caucasian

                  Non-Caucasian

                   

                  n (male:female)

                  131:165

                  30:40

                  ns

                   

                  Mean

                  SD

                  Mean

                  SD

                  p

                  Age (yr)

                  53.5

                  9.1

                  47.0

                  7.9

                  < 0.001

                  Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

                  27.5

                  4.2

                  27.5

                  4.3

                  ns

                  Waist circumference (cm)

                  93.3

                  21.1

                  90.8

                  12.2

                  ns

                  Total cholesterol (mmol/L)

                  5.99

                  0.72

                  5.77

                  0.77

                  ns

                  Triglycerides (mmol/L)

                  1.54

                  0.84

                  1.58

                  0.93

                  ns

                  HDL cholesterol

                  1.49

                  0.41

                  1.38

                  0.40

                  ns

                  LDL cholesterol

                  3.78

                  0.68

                  3.64

                  0.82

                  ns

                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2891-10-130/MediaObjects/12937_2011_452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 1

                  Time course of unadjusted percent changes from baseline of LDL-C in Caucasian (C) and non-Caucasian (N) subjects randomly assigned to consume the control cereal (Cont, C:N n = 74:13), or cereals containing 4 g low-MW oat β-glucan (4 L, C:N n = 51:12), 3 g medium-MW oat β-glucan (3 M, C:N n = 54:9), 4 g medium-MW oat β-glucan (4 M, C:N n = 50:17) or 3 g high-MW oat β-glucan (3 H, C:N n = 67:19) daily for 4 weeks. Values represent means ± SEM.

                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2891-10-130/MediaObjects/12937_2011_452_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 2

                  Difference in LDL-C, adjusted for baseline, in Caucasian (C, filled bars) and non-Caucasian (N, open bars) subjects after 4 weeks on cereals containing 4 g low-MW oat β-glucan (4 L, C:N n = 51:12), 3 g medium-MW oat β-glucan (3 M, C:N n = 54:9), 4 g medium-MW oat β-glucan (4 M, C:N n = 50:17) or 3 g high-MW oat β-glucan (3 H, C:N n = 67:19) daily versus mean adjusted-LDL-C after 4 weeks on Control in the same ethnic group. Values are means ± 95% CI.

                  Discussion

                  There is concern that the burden of chronic diseases is neglected globally especially in low- and middle-income countries [11]. Serum cholesterol, a marker of CHD risk, has fallen over the last 30 years in high-income countries but has not changed significantly or even risen in low- and middle-income countries [12]. To tackle the burden of chronic disease a combination of strategies may be used to promote healthy lifestyles [13]. It was suggested that private-sector initiatives (such as high-fiber breakfast-cereals) may be useful but more evidence on their effectiveness is needed [13]. In this context, there is increasing acceptance that viscous soluble fiber lower serum cholesterol, with claims allowed in Malaysia for products containing oat β-glucan [14] and Japan for products containing psyllium [15]. However, the evidence for these effects comes largely from studies in Caucasians. Thus, our results showing that oat β-glucan lowered LDL-C in non-Caucasians may be helpful to support global efforts to reduce CHD risk.

                  Since our study was not designed to compare the LDL-C-lowering effect of oat β-glucan in different ethnic groups, the results should be interpreted with caution. Also, we pooled non-Caucasian ethnic groups amongst whom differences may exist. Nevertheless, with 19% of subjects being non-Caucasian, few, if any studies to date on the cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan include a population as large and diverse as ours. Bioactive oat β-glucan tended to lower LDL-C more in non-Caucasians than Caucasians (0.37 vs 0.18 mmol/L; or 10.3 vs 4.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the study only had 34% power to detect a significant difference between Caucasians and non-Caucasians and, thus, was underpowered. Nevertheless, our results are consistent with the tendency for 3 g oat β-glucan in a ready-to-eat cereal to reduce LDL-C more in Hispanic Americans [16] than in predominantly (86%) Caucasian subjects [17], 7.5 vs 4.4% relative to control. Therefore, this effect may warrant further study.

                  Conclusion

                  We conclude that oat β-glucan reduces LDL-C in Caucasians and non-Caucasians, but there was insufficient power to determine if the magnitude of LDL-C-lowering differs by ethnicity.

                  Declarations

                  Acknowledgements

                  This work was supported by CreaNutrition, The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovations Systems (VINNOVA), and Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada.

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  (1)
                  Glycemic Index Laboratories, Inc.
                  (2)
                  Department of Statistics, University of Toronto
                  (3)
                  School of Molecular Bioscience, University of Sydney
                  (4)
                  Human Nutraceutical Research Unit, University of Guelph
                  (5)
                  Reading Scientific Services, Ltd
                  (6)
                  Institute on Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, Université Laval
                  (7)
                  Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada, Guelph Food Research Centre
                  (8)
                  CreaNutrition AG

                  References

                  1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD: Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997, 349:1269–1276.View Article
                  2. Murray CJL, Lopez AD: Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997, 349:1347–1352.View Article
                  3. Delahoy PJ, Magliano DJ, Webb K, Grobler M, Liew D: The relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by statins and reduction in risk of cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Thera 2009, 31:236–244.View Article
                  4. Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Whelton PK: Dietary fiber intake and reduced risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:1897–1904.View Article
                  5. Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM: Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999, 69:30–42.
                  6. Wolever TMS, Tosh SM, Gibbs AL, Brand-Miller J, Duncan AM, Hart V, Lamarche B, Thomson BA, Duss R, Wood PJ: Physicochemical properties of oat β-glucan influence its ability to reduce serum LDL cholesterol in humans: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2010, 92:723–732.View Article
                  7. Wood PJ, Beer MU, Butler G: Evaluation of role of concentration and molecular weight of oat β-glucan in determining effect of viscosity on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Brit J Nutr 2000, 84:19–23.
                  8. O'Meara JG, Kardia SLR, Armon JJ, Brown CA, Boerwinkle E, Turner ST: Ethnic and sex differences in the prevalence, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia among hypertensive adults in the GENOA study. Arch Int Med 2011, 164:1313–1318.View Article
                  9. Simon JA, Lin F, Hulley SB, Blanche PJ, Waters D, Shiboski S, Rotter JI, Nickerson DA, Yang H, Saad M, Krauss RM: Phenotypic predictors of response to simvastatin therapy among African-Americans and Caucasians: the Cholesterol and Pharmacogenetics (CAP) Study. Am J Cardiol 2006, 97:843–850.View Article
                  10. Mangravite LM, Medina MW, Cui J, Pressman S, Smith JD, Rieder MJ, Guo X, Nickerson DA, Rotter JI, Krauss RM: Combined influence of LDLR and HMGCR sequence variation on lipid-lowering response to simvastatin. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010, 30:1485–1492.View Article
                  11. Geneau R, Stuckler D, Stachenko S, McKee M, Ebrahim S, Basu S, Chockalingham A, Mwatsama M, Jamal R, Alwan A, Beaglehole R: Raising the priority of preventing chronic diseases: a political process. Lancet 2010, 376:1689–1698.View Article
                  12. Farzadfar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, Pelizzari PM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Lin JK, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Ezzati M, Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Cholesterol): National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3.0 million participants. Lancet 2011, 377:578–586.View Article
                  13. Cecchini M, Sassi F, Lauer JA, Lee YY, Guajardo-Barron V, Chisholm D: Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet 2010, 376:1775–1784.View Article
                  14. Food Safety & Quality Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia: Guide to nutrition labelling and claims. [http://​fsq.​moh.​gov.​my/​v2/​modules/​xt_​conteudo/​index.​php?​id=​30] 2010.
                  15. Ohama H, Ikeda H, Moriyama H: Health foods and foods with health claims in Japan. In Nutraceutical and Functional Food Regulations in the United States and Around the World. Edited by: Bagchi D. Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2008:251–280.
                  16. Karmally W, Montez MG, Palmas W, Martinez W, Branstetter A, Ramakrishnan R, Holleran SF, Haffner SM, Ginsberg HN: Cholesterol-lowering benefits of oat-containing cereal in Hispanic Americans. J Am Dietet Assoc 2005, 105:967–970.View Article
                  17. Maki KC, Beiseigel JM, Jonnalagadda SS, Gugger CK, Reeves MS, Farmer MV, Kaden VN, Rains TM: Whole-grain ready-to-eat oat cereal, as part of a dietary program for weight loss, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults with overweight and obesity more than a dietary program including low-fiber control foods. J Am Dietet Assoc 2010, 110:205–214.View Article

                  Copyright

                  © Wolever et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

                  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.