Comparison of two modes of vitamin B12supplementation on neuroconduction and cognitive function among older people living in Santiago, Chile: a cluster randomized controlled trial. a study protocol [ISRCTN 02694183]
© Sánchez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 31 March 2011
Accepted: 27 September 2011
Published: 27 September 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Clarke|
|17 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Ann Johnson|
|23 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Dangour|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Dangour|
|6 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Ann Johnson|
|12 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Hugo Sanchez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Hugo Sanchez|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Sep 2011||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2011||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-10-100|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.